Assembly Interface Management

Modified on Fri, 04 Oct 2019 at 10:15 AM

The bigger a system is, the more complex it is; this is no different for large CAD assemblies. Each component of the assembly is constrained to other components, sub-assemblies, and the top assembly – maintaining these references is referred to as interface management. In a normal design process, it’s not uncommon for component locations to move around, or for part numbers to change, or for a last-minute change from a supplier to affect your overall design. To keep up with these changes, CAD designers and engineers are constantly modifying their models to ensure the model looks appropriate, while also fixing model failures, broken references, and other headaches that often come with rapid design change and interface management.

Let’s look at a simple example to illustrate some of the interfaces designers have to manage while modeling an assembly. The following graphic shows a top assembly, a network data storage system. Inside of that assembly is a frame sub-assembly (structure), as well as three main internal component sub-assemblies: a power supply (PS 1), a disk drive (HDD 1), and a router (ROUTER 1).

Each of the components in this assembly has multiple critical interfaces. The frame, for example, has component mounting holes and connections for power and data. Each of the internal components has mounting feet and multiple power and data connections. Identifying, labeling, and tracking these interfaces is essential to ensuring your design functions as desired.

In real-world situations, this bookkeeping task becomes even more complex – as responsibility for each sub-assembly and the top assembly is frequently split among different engineers, teams, or external suppliers. It is not uncommon for a steady stream of design changes to affect the component interfaces.

Critical Interfaces Frequently Change

Throughout the design process, we find ourselves adding even more content into our CAD model. Screws, nuts, bolts, wires, connectors, and many other details are required for us to get a clear understanding of how the design will function. A typical designer would want to do that as fast and as accurately as possible – however, often times they focus on creating something that “looks right”, but may not consider what references they are using along the way.

For example, when placing the “ROUTER 1”, our designer decides to place it 2 inches from the left wall, and 3 inches from the bottom wall. However, if the frame was to physically get larger, how may the position of “ROUTER 1” have to change? And how would that new placement effect wire lengths?

Another more serious example would be if the “ROUTER 1” is replaced with an entirely new model. What would happen to the connectors that we had constrained directly to the box?

Modeling operations such as these often create “external references”, which are generally problematic. To make matters worse, references between components require all components to be loaded into your CAD session. For complex assemblies, one improper or missing external reference can dramatically affect productivity by increasing load times, regeneration times, and graphics operations.

These examples help identify the problem – how should we build, identify, and label these references in a way that avoid external references, keep our team communicating properly, and help minimize our risk? 

(Please continue to our next article in this series Skeleton Models)

Was this article helpful?

That’s Great!

Thank you for your feedback

Sorry! We couldn't be helpful

Thank you for your feedback

Let us know how can we improve this article!

Select atleast one of the reasons
CAPTCHA verification is required.

Feedback sent

We appreciate your effort and will try to fix the article